Tuesday, May 9, 2017

A thing worth considering when looking for partners and sponsors in esports

This one is inspired by a blogpost by Seth Godin "Three things you need if you want more customers". You can read the original here: https://goo.gl/hSshrS

A couple of days ago a friend of mine contacted me. He's done very well, and over the last few years build one of the biggest esports brands. We were chatting about sponsors and partnerships, and the brief exchange of opinions left me thinking:

Lately a lot of things are happening on the esports scene; tournaments, conventions, teams, shows, new games etc. They seem to grow on trees, and don't get me wrong - I love it.

The challenge is, they all go for the same handful of gaming-related companies and big players that are already investing in esports (like Coca-Cola). Some people try to think outside the box, and experiment - by cold-calling/mailing potential brands with a salespitch - but the effort ends there.

Esports is growing, that's a fact. If you look at the proportions; spectators/reach vs brand participation there's a clear imbalance.

So... Identify...
  • A group of potential partners you can reach.
  • Those partners having a (marketing) problem to solve, using your services.
  • Having a desire, and ability to spend money to solve the problem.
And then, educate. 

You chance for a meeting will definitely increase if you offer 1) a walk-through of the esports landscape, 2) a presentation on esports demographics - who is the typical esport spectator, 3) non-gaming-brand cases, 4) what marketing options are available in esports , 5) trends in media consumption etc. 

My point is, educate brands that are trying to reach the audience you're already reaching. Because when esports hit mainstream, who do you think is the first person they think of?

Sunday, April 24, 2016

Effective time management - The Management Matrix

Before I go over to the important stuff I want to share something with you: Lately I've been very busy (hence no post for a while), actually so busy that for the first time of my life I felt struggle to keep up with all my responsibilities. My position has expanded pretty rapidly; I've got new categories, teams, external partners and people to take care of over the last year.

It's not the matter of bad prioritization, time management or delegation. It's a state where you've too many tasks that has to be done now, that it affects the quality and time that should be spent on long-term and important responsibilities (that don't really have deadlines).

Now over to the important stuff: How did I manage to solve it?


I reached out for a book I read a while ago - 7 Habits of Highly Effective People, by Stephen Covey (if you haven't read it, you should definitely give it a try). The book introduced me to "The Management Matrix" (illustrated below), it might look kind of boring but it's very simple and powerful.




The Management Matrix is composed by four Quadrants:

Quadrant 1: These are the important and urgent tasks you face; it might be issues that suddenly arise or frequent responsibilities that require significant amount of time. Urgent means it requires immediate attention and insist on action. Importance on the other hand, has to do with results. Important tasks contributes to your goals, values and mission.  In my case some examples are executing marketing activities, important client briefs, weekly category meetings etc.

Quadrant 2: The heart of personal management and long-term processes. It deals with things that are important, but not urgent - therefore easily interrupted by Quadrant 1 and 3 activities. These are tasks that you know you need to do, but sometimes get pushed behind because they're not urgent. In my case some responsibilities in this quadrant are; make sure my team is awesome and motivated, take leanings from campaign evaluation, keep track on long-term goals and personal development.

Quadrant 3/4: We all have these in our lives, but we want to stay out of them as much as possible. Urgent or not, Quadrant 3 and 4 activities are not important. By limiting time spent here, you have more time for Quadrant 1 and 2. In my case typical Quadrant 3 and 4 activities could be replying to unimportant mails, attending meetings to please someone, checking Facebook and sending out reminders.

Now most of us have plenty of Quadrant 1 activities, but having too many of them will eat you up, together with the time you should have spent in Quadrant 2. Personally I find the second Quadrant most important; it's here you're steering the ship, analyzing the ocean and making sure the crew is doing good. Your Quadrant 1 activities should be the result of what you do in Quadrant 2.

To convince the management I made my own Management Matrix, to illustrate that as my position expanded, several Quadrant 1 responsibilities stuck with me. Tasks I couldn't just delegate and forget about. So I gave them a clear choice; Do you want me to spend majority of my time in Quadrant 1 doing what has to be done, and occasionally visiting Quadrant 2? Or would you rather see me working on the important stuff (majority Quadrant 2 + some Quadrant 1)?

I encourage you to make your own Management Matrix, for me this was a great exercise - one I plan to revisit every now and then to remind myself. It's also a good tool to see how much time you can save in Quadrant 3 and 4, but for it all to work you have to be honest with yourself.

Saturday, February 27, 2016

How to get most out of events

I see many companies invest big money in trade shows, events and expo's like DreamHack, Comic Con, Gamex etc.
It feels like most of them have the following strategy; (1) We will focus on products XXX, YYY, ZZZ … (2) Lets make a big wall or nice displays of all the product USPs, and (3) Rig up a couple of PCs/make some competitions around our products… Then they expect a crowded stand, engaged visiors, and that everyone will remember the uber expensive booth.

The truth is; most people don't really care about your USPs, they don't care about product XXX, YYY or ZZZ. You have some PC's lined up in your booth with the newest games on? Great, so does the other 20 exhibitors…

The sad part is, at the next event I see the same stands, of the same brands with the same plans… I have the feeling they struggle with defining goals and evaluation, so here is a step-by-step plan on how you can prepare for your next event:

  1. What is your main goal for the event? (Generate leads, branding, building brand ambassadors, showcase/teach…). Sidenote: It can't be all, all = none. Have one clear main goal.
  2. What do the visitors really want? How do you win their attention? No, they're not interested in your new "cutting-edge" rubber grip - unless you present it the way they want it.
  3. Combine point 1 & 2. How can you reach your goal, by giving the visitors what they want - and win their attention?
  4. Make an agenda, a plan - how you're going to keep the people in the booth engaged.
  5. Drop all the USP walls/displays - crisp and clean design looks much better.
  6. Bonus: How can you get some useful data out of the trade show? Some examples are: Focus groups on a upcoming project or your products, short questionnaire on what visitors think of your booth and activities (always have a small prize to get more answers), blindfold testings.
  1. Evaluate: Very important, and the key to master the art of winning attention and the expo-area. Gather the team and answer these questions (honestly):
    1. What was good about the event? What worked well?
    2. What did not work at all, that we should just drop?
    3. What can we do better for the upcoming event?
    4. Was the staff well trained? Do we need more/less people next time?
    5. Did we win the attention? Did someone else do a better job than us? If yes, what?
    6. From 1 to 10, how do we rate the event?


I challenge you to give it a try :) 

Sunday, February 21, 2016

How to create a buyer persona on budget?


The best place to start is in the channel you have biggest reach; (for example: Facebook, Mail, webside). First you want to get the basics in place (demographics), and you want a lot of answers to have much data to work with. I personally make a questionnaire with about 15 questions (to get more engagement you can always throw in a prize). The goal of this exercise is to understand who your customers are:

  • Gender
  • Age
  • Occupation
  • Interests/hobbies
  • Which social medias are most popular?
  • Social status
  • Are they influencers on a given subject in their family/friend-circle

When you have all data gathered you create the average customer. Give him a name, a face.

After you have these basics in place - it's all about your creativity to get to know your buyer persona even better; use focus groups/trade-shows/competitions to get more info on:


  • Buying process
  • Decision making
  • Favourite brands/shows/channels/celebrities
  • Who are their influencers?
  • What type of content do they want to see more from you?

Sunday, February 7, 2016

Why buyer personas, and how to use them?


 I've noticed that many companies in the tech/gaming industry don't operate with buyer personas.
They spend big money on trade shows, reserach, sponsorships and video content.. But yet don't have buyer personas.

Two very good reasons to implement buyer personas:
  1. It will become a hub for all data/insight you have on a given target group - that you keep expanding for each new piece of information you get.
  2. Your communication will be aligned; by sharing your persona internal (design team, copywriters, content department etc) and external (creative agencies, video production etc) everyone will have a clear (and the same) picture on who the audience is.

When you have your typical customer in place, it will help you determine:

  • Which influencers to work with
  • Which teams to sponsor
  • Which events/trade shows to focus on
  • How to present your products
  • What content to focus on